Google’s Gemini Nano Banana and the Cost of Convenience

The company’s new AI image and photo editor deepens concerns over data use and consent gaps, experts warn.
Image by Nalini Nirad
Google’s new Gemini Nano Banana AI image editor and photo editor has pushed conversations about privacy and security back into the spotlight.  The tool, which allows users to easily generate or edit images, placing themselves alongside celebrities or altering facial features, has rekindled debates around biometric data, user consent, and surveillance capitalism. While Google maintains that its models are not trained on personal photos, experts point out that the underlying technology may still be used for behavioural tracking, facial recognition, and metadata analysis. Consent Gaps and Normalised Surveillance at Scale Eamonn Maguire, director of engineering, AI & ML at Proton, in an interaction with AIM, described Nano Banana as “a troubling expansion of surveillan
Subscribe or log in to Continue Reading

Uncompromising innovation. Timeless influence. Your support powers the future of independent tech journalism.

Already have an account? Sign In.

📣 Want to advertise in AIM? Book here

Picture of Ankush Das
Ankush Das
I am a tech aficionado and a computer science graduate with a keen interest in AI, Coding, Open Source, Global SaaS, and Cloud. Have a tip? Reach out to ankush.das@aimmediahouse.com
Related Posts
AIM Print and TV
Don’t Miss the Next Big Shift in AI.
Get one year subscription for ₹5999
Download the easiest way to
stay informed